Moths and Butterflies

Why is the wargaming so distracting? The simple answer is that I am a convicted rules tart. I can only see a set of rules or some review if I am drawn to them.

Moths

I’m like a moth to a candle. Nor do I think I am the only warmer to suffer from such an affliction. Many fellow hobbyists talk of large plastic boxes filled with unfinished projects or bookshelves bursting with rules, books and scenarios. A recent podcast by Wargaming, Soldiers and Strategy, made the same point. Only one of the presenters was disciplined enough to complete one project before moving on to the next. Therefore, I think I am in the majority of wargamers.

Butterflies

The podcast gave me hope and the feeling that I am not unusual to butterfly around and try different periods and rule sets. I have a dozen projects in various stages. A quarter, on average, are keepers. I will invest time, money and immigration. Currently, there’s are; Fantastic Battles is an epic-level fantasy game that has been the subject of several posts. I am planning a campaign to continue the story that started at Blackthorn Abbey. More about that in a future post.
Pulp Alley is a skirmish game set in the era of pulp comics, the 1930s and 1940s. I am about to start one of the authors', Phipps and Daughter, many excellent campaign expansions, Tomb of the Serpent.
Strength and Honour, a new set of rules for the ancient period, allows me to fight the battles of the late Republic and early empire on a man-to-man scale. It has also opened my eyes to the potential of 2mm. However, more about that is below.

Despite my butterfly approach to the hobby, these games have allowed me to get a regular flow of fun to the table. Howvever, like a moth I am drawn to the light of news rules and period that suddenly appeal.

The Indian Mutiny

An advantage of the butterflying is that it gets you to read loads of stuff I would only sometimes think about. An example is the Indian Mutiny of 1857. The story, as always, starts with a set of rules, Sharps Practice by the Two Fat Lardies. It is best described as a large skirmish game, something I do not usually get drawn to, but the rules are innovative, have the potential for some great characters and provide a solid narrative for the games. Therefore, after some initial reading, I am building a series of linked adventures around the 1st Madras Fusiliers, or Neils's Blue Caps. The young officers, the heroes of my story, would fight their way from Allahabad to Lucknow and onto Cawnpore. The Indian Mutiny is full of individual memoirs, a luxury for a medievalist that provided many sources of inspiration for designing scenarios.

The World of 2mm

As mentioned in a previous post, Strength and Honour have opened my eyes to 2mm wargaming. Have a quick look at this Facebook group to whet your appetite. The scale is cheap to get to the table and ideal for recreating historical battles. Also, it meets my need to try different periods at little outlay in time and money. Currently, I am putting some research together to enter the world of Horse and Musket, the sixteenth century and the Napoleonic wars. The painting side is quick but brings challenges regarding how to represent whole brigades or tercios on a base. Initially, I am looking at Napoleonic rules aimed at divisions and corp command structure. I am assessing the rules on the following criteria; basing conventions, solo play, community support, published scenarios, either official or otherwise, complexity, and finally, campaign potential. Then the plan is to narrow the list down to two or three rule sets to playtest thoroughly. The winner will be the one I enjoy the most—more of this journey to follow.

More to Follow

As any mathematician will not, this is only a handful of my projects. More will follow on my various skirmish games, my work reproducing the battles and warfare of the twelfth-century world and my fascination with the War of the Roses.

 

Strength & Honour

Strength and Honour is a new set of ancient battles written by Mark Backhouse and published by the Two Fat Lardies' Reisswitz Press. The rules recreate the battles from the Late Republic to Early Empire, i.e., from the Marian reforms 105BC to about 200AD. In this era, the protagonists fielded massive armies, 20,000 men a side was not unusual. Therefore, while the rules are scale agnostic, they are aimed at a 2mm scale where a base represents a whole Roman legion, some 4,000 to 6,000 men. Conversely, a Celtic or German Warband could account for 8,000 warriors. Using this small scale, the player might lose the majesty of a painted cohort on the march but gains a virtually stunning battlefield.

Army Lists

The army lists provided not only cover Rome, Gauls and German, but lists are also provided for the Numidians, Spanish, Ancient Britons and the armies of Mithridates. These lists give the gamer a wide range of tactical approaches to the period's warfare. The Mithridatic phalanx in 2mm looks particularly stunning, so I am hoping for a supplement to cover the Early Republic and the Successor States. Mark has also provided scenarios for ten historical battles, including Chaeronea (86BC), Bagradas River (49BC), Watling Street (60/61AD), and 2nd Cremona (69AD) during the civil wars that brought Vespasian to power. Other battles can be found on the Facebook page dedicated to the rules.

Most of these scenarios involved 6 Roman legions and a slightly larger number of war bands. This means the painting requirement is small, and the cost of entry is low. Reisswitz has produced paper armies that can be stuck to the bases for those who want to play immediately so they are ready for battle.

The Rules

I will not provide a detailed games review, but four mechanisms give this rule a unique feel.

1. Grid movement coupled with some randomness to the distance covered makes movement easy but keeps a level of uncertainty. 
2. The idea of a reversal of futures when a command action fails, and the initiative passes to the opponent. This makes the length of a turn variable, something found in other Fat Lardies games and makes the commander plan carefully the order he moves his troops. The mechanism reflects, IMO, that manoeuvring huge blocks of men around with only the use of messengers and signals is fraught with difficulty.
3. The Command Board is another device that sets the game apart. This board reflects the general’s influence over the battle. The number of tokens available is based on the army, the general and by Consulting the Auguries, the random element. The tokens, some great-looking coins available from Warbases, are then placed on the Command Board, reflecting the general's strategy. Playing these tokens allows the general to influence manoeuvre, attack, defence or rally his men. However, these valuable resources must be used carefully, as I found to my cost.The last game mechanic is the Setback and Disaster cards. These cards are printed with a number on their reverse that remains hidden. A setback in the battle leads to the player drawing a card which remains invisible to both sides. When the general thinks his opponent has passed his breakpoint, he declares ‘Homunculus Est’. The cards are then revealed and counted. If the cards exceed the breakpoint, the battle is lost. However, if the commander has called too earlier, the surviving player can discard a card.

My First Battle

My starter game was the Cicilian Gates (39BC), a small action during the Caesar and Pompey Civil Wars. Wikipedia provides a summary of the historical battle - Battle_of_the_Cilician_Gates. The sides are relatively small for Strength & Honour, two legions aside with supporting skirmishers and cavalry.

The Parthians/Pompeians had the advantage in cavalry, plenty of light horses and the dreaded cataphracts, but their infantry needed to be more experienced than the Caesarians. For me, the troop types set the strategy. The Pompeian light horse would harass the Caesarian wings while the centre held its position. The aim was to weaken the flanks making Bassus’s (the Caesarian commander) legions vulnerable on the flank. The Ceasarians had two options: to remain on the high ground and draw the Parthians and Pompeians to their defensive position or smash through the enemy’s centre. I went for the latter because of the threat of the light horse in trying to maintain this static position, and it seemed more Roman.

The battle started well for the Romans. After consulting the auguries, they rolled double six, which gave them an impressive Command Board that could maintain their attacking strategy.
The battle started with the light horse moving forward as the Caesarian legions moved down the hill. Skirmishers and the Parthian light horse exchanged fire on the right, with the skirmishers getting the better of the Parthians. Some terrible dice rolls here. On the left wing, the Parthians were more successful, as the Caesarian horse were harassed with bow fire but too scared to move forward because of the threat of the cataphracts.

The Pompeian's legions decided to hold their position across the road a let the cavalry for their job. The Parthian light horse on the right continued to be unlucky and eventually decided to call it a day. Here was my big error. I should have used the resources on the Command board better to give the Parthian light horse more support. However, with the Parthian/Pompeian left flank collapsing, the weaker legion became fodder for the better Caesarian legions. Finally, ‘Homunculus Est’ was called, and what remained of the Parthian/Pompeians fled.

An enjoyable game.

Since then, I have played Caesar v Ariovistus’ Germans. The game involved 6 Roman legions and eight tribal warbands, each with their supporting cavalry. This one was a close call but Caeser triumphs but only just.

 

 

The Feud

This wargame had a long gestation period. It took three Kickstarters plus many hours of painting before I have managed to get Baron’s War to the table. Barons War is a medieval skirmish game set in the thirteenth century.  The game was initially launched on Kickstarter in 2019 with figures for the Barons revolt against King John. Since then, further Kickstaters have followed, including several campaigns. Overall, the game is well supported and has supplements for the late Saxons, Vikings, the Norman Conquest, and the Crusades in Outremer.

A range of figures is also available through Footsore Miniatures. The miniatures paint up well, but like any medieval project takes a while to paint. This is my excuse for taking nearly two years to set up a game. The good news is the game can be played with about 25 figures aside, although a more significant skirmish can be fought as your retinues grow.

Skirmish on the Evesham Road.

Like all my games, there has to be a  strong narrative, so here is the backstory to the game. One aspect of the game I like is the campaign rules allow you, the players, to generate a grievance between the two warring barons and the flashpoint that ignited the armed hostilities. My campaign is set before Magna Carta and is loosely based on the campaign supplement, The Most Ignoble Feud. Therefore, this scenario will be the first of three games in the mini-campaign.  I also plan to use this storyline to test different rules and my ideas. 

Rivals in the West Country

The period witnessed John favouring baron families from outside his English realm. One of these was  Gérard d'Athée, a trusted lieutenant of King John, who had served him in France and later as a High Sheriff in England. Gerald was joined by one of his relatives Engelard, one of the protagonists of our story, whom John had appointed High Sheriff of both Gloucestershire and Herefordshire in 1210. The rapid rise of these men caused resentment amongst the English baronage, including the de Cares, a powerful family. The father, Richard de Clare, was Earl of Hereford and his son, Gilbert, had inherited the earldom of Gloucestershire from his mother. It is Gilbert, the son, who is our other feuding baron.

Monastery at Haines

Engelard's attempt to found a monastery at Hailes, at the centre of the de Clare’s holdings, sparked our fictional feud. Gilbert considered this one transgression too far and decided to ambush Engeland and his monks on the way to Hailes on the Evesham road.

The Ambush

In preparation for his attack, Gilbert had blocked the road with several carts and tree trunks, forcing the battle into the narrow area between the wood to the south and the hills to the north. He hoped his superiority in mounted knights would be most effective in this narrow killing ground. On hearing from his scouts that the road was blocked, Engelard deployed his experienced archers and foot sergeants on either side of the road to try to turn the barricade. His smaller mounted contingent would be used to exploit any weakness.

At first, Engelard's plan bore fruit; his archers, supported by some militant monks, pushed Gilbert's crossbowmen back from the small farm and started to move into the forest. If they could expel the de Clare's crossbowmen, they could be able to shoot onto the flanks of men manning the barricade. Englelard's men had yet to make progress on the road but had pinned down the rest of Gilbert's infantry. At this point, Englelard decided to commit himself and his mount troops to attack the open land between the road and the hilly area. This was the moment Gilbert had been waiting for, and he committed his mounted knight. The knight quickly crushed Engelard's mounted sergeants and attacked Englelard and his knightly bodyguard. Outnumbered and taking casualties, Engelard fled to seek his revenge on another day.

The Rules and the Game

Overall, I liked the rules, and I thought I had a great feel and produced an exciting weekend game. My one criticism is that I found the rules difficult to reference, despite QRS (Quick Reference Sheet), but this is probably true of any new set of rules. I plan to continue Engelard's and Gilbert's feud with a significant battle when Englelard seeks revenge for the dishonour inflicted on the Evesham road. However, the next episode will be played with Lion Rampart rules, so I can compare. 

The Story Continues

The story of Engelard's and Gibert's feud continues here.

Links

Warhost is the home of Baron's Warand includes articles and a retinue builder.

Barons War Facebook Group. A discussion group with many great photos for inspiration, army lists and downloads.

Blood Cries Afar, well research but readable book on the 1st Barons War. Great for inspiration and ideas.